Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matt Kuhar vs Jake Van Emburgh Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kuhar vs Emburgh analysis and find out who is favored!
Matt Kuhar vs Jake Van Emburgh Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kuhar 0 - 0 Emburgh
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kuhar has won 49.06% of points on their second serve, while Emburgh has won 41.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kuhar, in recent form, has won 51.25% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emburgh has won 44.77%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.75% and 33.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kuhar has saved 46.91% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emburgh has saved 44.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kuhar has won 47.62% of matches played (W/L 10/ 11), with Emburgh winning 48% (W/L 24/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kuhar has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 7/ 7). Emburgh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 52/ 38), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Kuhar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 10/ 10), where as Emburgh has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48% of matches (W/L 24/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kuhar has played against opponents with an average rank of 79.14 while Emburgh has played against players with an average rank of 101.36.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kuhar has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emburgh has won 69% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kuhar has converted 50.68% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emburgh has converted 43.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
897
Rank
877
High
27
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
59% (76-52)
Career Total W/L
53% (74-65)
40% (4-6)
YTD W/L
24% (4-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Matt Kuhar vs Jake Van Emburgh For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kuhar VS Emburgh
Sportsbook
Offer
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matt Kuhar | Jake Van Emburgh |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 40% (4/6) | 24% (4/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (10/14) | 23% (8/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (100/113) | 40% (136/201) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 20% (2/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.22 |
| Aces Total | 26 | 36 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 39 | 25 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:28 | 1:23:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 68 | 79.82 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (374/622) | 61% (530/863) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (236/374) | 59% (313/530) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (121/248) | 41% (137/333) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (35/68) | 43% (30/69) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (286/691) | 38% (339/904) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 44% (4/5) | 24% (4/13) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (4/10) | 24% (4/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (6/0) | 0% (13/0) |
Matt Kuhar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Miles Jones
Player
Matt Kuhar
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Lorenzo Claverie
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Matt Kuhar
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
44 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
102
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Matthew Hulme
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
38 of
49)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Matt Kuhar
64%
(
53 of
83)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
35 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Nicaise Muamba
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
39 of
63)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aristotelis Thanos
Player
Matt Kuhar
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matt Kuhar
Player
Leo Vithoontien
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Pereira
Player
Matt Kuhar
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
59%
(
16 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thomas Brown
Player
Matt Kuhar
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
26 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jake Van Emburgh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joshua Charlton
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
81%
(
43 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Fabio Nestola
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Esquici
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
2
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
0
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Peliwo
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Klizan
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
43 of
59)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Jake Van Emburgh
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(4) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Kuhar Vs Emburgh Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kuhar are available here and Emburgh photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
